|
|
The
Synthesis Of Past and Present in
American Material Culture
by
Jennifer K. Mulcahy
©
1996 Jennifer K. Mulcahy. All rights reserved.
A relationship between humankind and material culture is inevitable. No
matter
where we grow up or live during our lives, we use and place meaning in
inanimate objects in our environment. Throughout history, cultures have
made, kept and adapted traditions and meanings within their lives; governing
the sizes and shapes of their houses, the decoration and form of cooking
tools, the way they dressed, the toys their children played with, the
furniture they used, as well as a countless array of other material goods
used in daily life. Different styles of all of these types of things can
often ' be traced to nationality and period from their distinctions. I
feel that America, especially as we move further and further away from
colonial times, is a somewhat ambiguous blend between past European-influenced
artifacts and modem American pieces of equipment. In my own life experience
growing up in New England, I have found a romanticism of the "quaint"
and "simpler" life of America's past combined with the modem
need for convenience, entertainment technologies, and tools with which
to keep up with the pace of a much faster world. This mixture leads to
an odd mixture of artifacts were my own house to be excavated someday,
along with both some potential confusion and several cultural implications
to be gained from the consideration of these objects.
My parents and I live
in a medium-sized house in a fairly small rural town called Clarksburg,
Massachusetts. Our house was built sometime in the 1950's, and therefore
it has a more suburban look to its structure than anything else. However,
a look at the outside of our house is the first clue that our belongings
are an odd mixture of the old and new, integrated in ways that I feel
make the result our own kind of material culture. An old-fashioned fence
runs across our front lawn, with a wooden wheelbarrow from the first half
of this century to one side and an old cast-iron lamppost to the other.
Attached to our white aluminum siding are brass lantern light fixtures,
and our front door has an
old brass knocker found at a flea market somewhere. The Victorian lace
curtains seem to go well with the rest of tile decor, yet an unmistakably
electric light flows almost constantly from our family room as my father
watches television on our wide screen TV and the antique wheelbarrow seems
to watch with fascination when the garage door opens automatically, allowing
my mother to return from work. Rather than clashing, these contrasting
material styles and objects seem to complement each other.
Inside our house,
there are rooms of both mixed style and some of one or the
other. Our kitchen is one of the rooms where the biggest mixture lies.
There is an oak commode, cabinet, desk, and a couple dressers from the
early 20th century. There is an antique cherry table with matching chairs
and assorted other relics. In addition. There is a modem plastic counter,
linoleum floor, a microwave, stereo speakers, a dishwasher, and other
modem appliances. Our dining room has a long oak table from the early
1900's and there are a few more antique commodes and very old glassware.
This carries over into our reading room, which has many more of these
kinds of antiques, with a state-the-
art stereo hiding in one of the cabinets. Our living room has a wide screen
television, surround sound, exercise equipment, a modem sofa and chair
and some antique lamps and chairs as well. Our upstairs has all antique
furniture along with computer equipment and other electronics. People
excavating this house might be confused by the array of periods our belongings
come from. Deetz discusses a bit of confusion over dating 'sites due to
"hand-me-downs" and other inconsistencies (1). This problem
might seem to parallel this one, however if any of the modem equipment
survived in the excavation the
date would automatically be brought up to at least that date, so our decorative
anachronism could still be accurately dated.
The kitchen's contents and setup are telling of the values of a time.
Instead of spending a lot of time eating together, our family all eats
separately and quickly. This could be told from our microwave oven, coffee
pot, our cupboards of ready-to-eat snacks and our refrigerator full of
plastic containers containing microwaveable meals. Caffeine addiction
could be readily deduced by the dominance of coffee mugs over any other
sort of food container or server. The second largest group are our Tupperware
and other microwaveable dishes. These show how we live, much like the
cookware of early New England. Their cooking pots also served as bowls,
much like our microwaveable dishes do. This also suggests that meal time
was not formalized, but was rather treated more as a necessity. (2) However,
during holidays our attitude towards food takes on a different flavor.
Rather than serving a Technomic unction, another set of dishes serves
a Socio-technic function. Dishes are highly embellished and food is prepared
for aesthetic purposes as well as taste and the technical purpose of feeding.
Eating becomes a social event, and much time is taken in preparation and
consumption. At Christmas time, a special set of dishes and trays with
symbols of the season are used, and our meal service takes on a pointedly
Ideo-technic function. Much like Deetz's example of the different
uses for candles, food containers, cookware and serving utensils take
on all of these different functions depending on their context and sort.
(3)
My father has a fascinating
hobby that ties right in with my discussion of the past and present material
cultures of New England blending. He takes antique clocks and puts new
clockwork inside them to make them run again, and he canes and revarnishes
antique chairs that he finds at antique fairs and shops all over the northeastern
United - States. The clocks have an old-time facade with brand new insides,
and while they appear to be completely of a different time and style of
our own modem time, their internal mechanisms are often quite up to date.
This makes me think of a sort of time- cyborg, a mix of old and new where
it's difficult to tell just where the old ends and the new begins. This
sort of redevelopment and reworking of the past also applies to my father's
work on chairs. Deetz recalls a time, beginning around the early seventeenth
century, and progressing onward from there, when chairs became more common
in households and began to hold symbolism and meaning. At least one chair
was usually owned even by poor early Plymouth colonists, and the popularity
of chairs grew in both Anglo-America and England. This popularity inspired
the design of a wide variety of different kinds of chairs. Our house has
an impressive variety of these different sorts of chairs.(4) My father's
favorite kind to work on, however, is the kind with no seat of wood or
leather, but an open circular seat with holes for caning to be tied and
woven. He has purchased a few books on the art of caning, but I believe
he really has a natural talent for this largely lost art form. He adds
to this creative restoration by varnishing the chairs to make them appear
their best. The result is a chair that is beautifully new yet hauntingly
old at the same time. Some people may think that my father is doing the
antiques a disservice by altering them in this way, but I find his creative
renewal of our nation's earliest beauty to be innovative and inspiring.
My environment at
home is one that, at first glance, may seem chaotic and confusing. This
is not an instance of George Washington suddenly finding an IBM compatible
laptop on his fireplace mantle, though. These times are times of such
technology, but the past is ours to borrow from as well. From hiding our
stereo in an antique commode to putting my computer on my grandfather's
old desk in my room to my father's renovation of antiques using his modem
knowledge and his own creativity, I feel that this is not an odd patchwork
quilt of mismatched material culture struggling to have synthesis. On
the contrary, I feel that these are all ways of keeping our American heritage
and past alive while at the same time weaving our own ideas and technology
into the best of the past and present, creating the future of American
material culture.
Endnotes
Footnotes;
(1) Deetz,p. 18
(2) Deetz,p. 52
(3) Deetz,p. 51
(4) Deetz, p. 121-122
Bibliography
Deetz, James. In Small Things Forgotten- Anchor Books, Doubleday,
New York,NY. 1977.
top
|
|